By 732 CE, the armies of the Umayyad
Caliphate, with their conquest of the Iberian Peninsula well under way, had
crossed the Pyrenees only to be defeated in France by Charles Martel at the
Battle of Tours. With only 250 kilometers between Carthage in North Africa and
the western Sicilian city of Trapani and just eight kilometers from Messina on
the northeast corner of Sicily to Reggio di Calabria on the toe of Italy’s
boot, it might seem that Sicily would be the ideal route through which Muslim
armies from Ifriqiya could attack what Winston Churchill once called the “soft
underbelly” of Europe. However, it was another hundred years before the
military of the Aghlabid dynasty in Ifriqiya invaded Sicily in 827 and
eventually established an emirate there. Over the next two and a half centuries
between this invasion and the conquest of the island from the mainland by the
Normans in 1071, Arab Muslims exercised at least partial, but often total,
control over Sicily. Despite this comparatively brief period of Arab-Muslim
rule, the period had enormous economic, political, and cultural consequences
for the island, many of which persisted long after the Arabs were gone.
Because of its geographic location at
the center of the Mediterranean and the ability to sail there from Carthage in
a matter of days and from there to Reggio in only hours, Sicily has played an
enormous strategic role for all governments that have held it. Aside from its
obvious military importance, because of Sicily's temperate climate, this role
has been chiefly economic and principally agricultural. Under Roman rule, the
island had served as a breadbasket for other areas, producing wheat that was
largely exported elsewhere.[1]
Following periods of Vandal and Gothic occupation, the Byzantine Empire
extended its rule over Sicily in the mid-sixth century CE, during which period
the island largely continued to play this important economic/agricultural role,
particularly after the loss of Egypt to the Muslims in 641 and the long embattled
state of Anatolia through the ninth century. In addition, a mint was
established at Syracuse in the 640s.[2]
With the establishment of Arab control,
these roles necessarily changed. Perhaps in contrast with expectations,
although military conflict hampered trade at times, Sicily nevertheless
continued to serve as an important economic crossroads, both in terms of
currency and agriculture. First, Sicily's role in the production of currency
continued during the Arab period. British historian Alex Metcalfe notes that
the Arab minting of coins began almost immediately, noting, "the first
coinage with the Arabic legend Ṣiqilliyya
were struck at the siege of Castrogiovanni as early as 829 and, within four
years of the fall of Palermo, the first coins bearing the name of its governor
are attested."[3]
Metcalfe reports further that, although the Aghlabid dynasty failed to establish
use of the gold dinar in Sicily, the later Fatimid dynasty that ruled the
island successfully circulated the tari,
with the coin remaining in circulation both on Sicily and the mainland for
centuries to follow.[4]
More importantly, agriculture in Sicily
expanded tremendously under Arab rule. The economist Andrew M. Watson has
described an Arab "agricultural revolution" that impacted the
economies all of area occupied by the Arabs, Sicily included. Watson records a
total of sixteen food crops, as well as cotton,[5]
and he suggests that the implanting of crop species from warm Arab climates
into areas such as Sicily resulted in longer growing seasons with more abundant
yields.[6]
The introduction of diversification among crops resulted in greater choice
among landowners and farmers for how land could be used.[7]
Finally, innovations by Arabs to irrigation systems resulted in cotton being
grown on some of the previously worst land in Sicily, and Watson writes that
"we may assume that this crop also helped to push back the frontier of
sedentary agriculture."[8]
Today, several important exports from Sicily, including lemons and cotton, come
from crops introduced during the Arab period, and wheat continues to be
produced there.[9]
From a political perspective, as already
noted, the key change that occurred in the ninth century CE was that political
control passed from Byzantine to Arab hands. In some ways, there is perhaps no
more emblematic way to examine this change than to compare the roles of
Sicily's two main cities -- Syracuse on the eastern coast and Palermo in the
northwest -- during the period under discussion. In the seventh century, the
Byzantines elevated Sicily to the status of a theme -- the chief administrative
division of the empire -- and Emperor Constans II moved his imperial court to
Syracuse as well, using the city as a base to raid Lombard-held areas of Italy.
Until its fall to the Arabs in 878, Syracuse remained the capital of the theme.[10]
However, Metcalfe reports, "Much of the material infrastructure of Syracuse
itself – its walls, churches and houses – was damaged, and the city was
stripped of its transferable wealth in two months of post-conquest
looting."[11]
Comparatively speaking, Palermo, then
known as Panormus, seems to have become something of a backwater in the late
Byzantine period, despite its earlier role as an important port. The French
historian Vivien Prigent has argued that Palermo initially witnessed an
increase in importance among Sicilian cities but that it eventually was
eclipsed by other cities in the northwest of Sicily and never grew in size or
importance such that it became necessary to replace the ancient Punic walls
around the city with sturdier defenses.[12]
Because it fell earlier than Syracuse, the Arabs established their capital in
Palermo. The evolution of the capital city over a one hundred-year period is
perhaps demonstrated by comparing eyewitness accounts of the city.
The first, from 880 CE, is a letter from
Theodosius, a Greek monk residing in Syracuse, to Leo, an archdeacon of the
Christian church, detailing an eyewitness account of the Arab conquest of
Syracuse after decades of sporadic sieges and raids. From Syracuse, Theodosius was
brought as a slave to Palermo, which he describes as an "extremely famous
and populous city,"[13]
in which multiple ethnicities intermingled both freely and in the prisons. He
commented further, "Wherefore the people being crowded together in such a
press of inhabitants, began to build and inhabit houses without the walls, to
such an extent that they really built many cities round the original one, not
unequal to it, if one choose, either for attack or defence [sic]."[14]
Clearly in the short period between the fall of Palermo and Theodosius's visit,
the city had already crown in size and importance.
The second account of Palermo dates from
972 CE, by which point the city had grown even more. The author, Ibn Hawqal, an
Arab cartographer born in present-day southern Turkey who wrote a book about
his travels, wrote that Palermo "consists of five quarters, each one close
to the others, but situated in such a way that the borders of each are clearly
defined. The largest quarter … is enclosed by a high defensive stone wall and
inhabited by merchants." Beyond the city now extending to five quarters,
all of which Ibn Hawqal describes in some detail, it is also clear that the
city had grown sufficiently in importance that it was now defended by more
substantial walls. In the outlying areas of the city, Ibn Hawqal reports the
presence of more than two hundred mosques, stating, "I have not heard
anything like it except what they say about Cordova [in Spain]."[15]
In fact, regarding the city walls, Ibn
Hawqal specifically describes the city quarter called Al-Khalisa, known today
as Kalsa, nothing that it "has a wooden wall which is not like the stone
wall that surrounds the Old City."[16]
Metcalfe dates the building of this city quarter to the reign in Palermo of
Khalil ibn Ishaq, an army commander sent by the Fatimids from Cairo to restore
order during a period of strife.[17]
This same Khalil was responsible for tearing down the earlier walls. In the
"Cambridge Chronicle," an anonymous history of Sicily written in the
tenth or eleventh century, it is reported that, on October 13 of either 937 or
938, Khalil "entered [Palermo] with large numbers of troops and began to
raze the walls of [Palermo] and pull down its gates."[18]
Metcalfe finally reports the walls being further fortified in 967.[19]
The walls to which Ibn Hawqal bore witness five years later were, it turns out,
perhaps quite new.
Clearly, Palermo's role as capital city
of Sicily, which it remains today, was the direct outgrowth of the transition
from Byzantine to Arab rule. However, it bears mention that Arab control of
Sicily encompassed several different governments, in the forms of caliphates
and dynasties, between the eighth and eleventh centuries. The Aghlabid dynasty,
based in Carthage in North Africa (Ifriqiya), was the power that first invaded
Sicily in 827 and secured control over the whole island. However, in 909, the
Aghlabids lost Ifriqiya to the Shia Fatimid Caliphate based in Egypt. In 948,
the Fatimids appointed the Kalbid dynasty to rule Sicily. In 973, the Fatimids installed
the Zirid dynasty in Sicily, which ruled the island until 1053, at which point
central control broke down. Eight years later, the Norman conquest of Sicily
began.[20]
More momentous than either the economic
or political changes that Sicily experienced between the eighth and eleventh
centuries were the cultural shifts that occurred there. These changes can be
best understood through the lenses of religion and language. From the
standpoint of religion, Sicily underwent with the Arab invasion the obvious
infusion of a Muslim population in what was formerly a Christian population
with a small Jewish minority. The standard imposition of rule of Christians and
Jews by Muslims would involve the imposition of the status of dhimmi, with the requirement payment of
certain taxes and limited toleration. This type of rule was imposed over the
western portion of the island, and a large number of former Christians also
converted to Islam. However, in the eastern portion of the island, which both
was more difficult to conquer and lay in closer proximity to the Italian
mainland, the status of Christians ranged from dhimma to the requirement of tribute payments to de facto
independence.[21]
Long-term truces between the Byzantine Empire and the Muslim rulers of Sicily
facilitated such a status quo.
Linguistically, the effects of
Arab-Muslim rule were longer, persisting to the present day. The Romans had
established the speaking of a Romance language in Sicily, but as the Byzantines
took control, Greek slowly began to be established as a common spoken language.
Quite obviously, the Arab invaders spoke Arabic. Today, the language spoken in
Sicily is a Romance language that demonstrates a marked Arabic influence. For
instance, Berkeley professor of Romance Languages Barbara De Marco has argued
that the contemporary Sicilian term for a simpleton -- mamaluccu -- is cognate with the Arabic word for a slave – mamluk.[22]
Similarly, Metcalfe has demonstrated how several Sicilian town names, including
Calatrasi and Calatafimi, are formed in part from the Arabic word for a fort --
qal'at.[23]
These examples supplement the previous instance of the Al-Khalisa section of
Arab Palermo, now known Kalsa.
Clearly, the impact of the Arab invasion
and conquest of Sicily beginning in the ninth century C.E. had monumental
effects on the island. In addition to the political shift from Byzantine to
Islamic political control, the economic role of Sicily as granary and mint to the
surrounding areas expanded greatly. From a cultural standpoint, the effect was
arguably the greatest, with a large-scale religious metamorphosis among the
population lasting centuries but the linguistic effects of the conquest
persisting to the current day. While the Arab-Muslim impact on Spain is perhaps
better known today due to its longer duration, the impact of the Muslim world
on Sicily was also quite profound.
[1]
This epithet for Sicily (together with North Africa and Sardinia) seems to
originate in Cicero's Pro Lege Manilia
34: "He [Cnæus Pompeius], when the weather could hardly be called open for
sailing, went to Sicily, explored the coasts of Africa; from thence he came
with his fleet to Sardinia, and these three great granaries of the republic he
fortified with powerful garrisons and fleets." Translated by C.D. Yonge,
Perseus Digital Library, accessed November 28, 2015,
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0019%3Atext
%3DMan.%3Achapter%3D12%3Asection%3D34
%3DMan.%3Achapter%3D12%3Asection%3D34
[2]
Michael F. Hendy, Studies in the Byzantine
Monetary Economy c. 300-1450 (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge
University Press, 2008), 421-422.
[3]Alex
Metcalfe, The Muslims of Medieval Italy
(Edinburgh, U.K.: Edinburgh University Press, 2009), 13.
[4]
Ibid, 63-64.
[5]
Andrew M. Watson, "The Arab Agricultural Revolution and Its Diffusion,
700-1100," Journal of Economic
History, 34 (1974): 9.
[6]
Ibid, 10
[7]
Ibid, 14
[8]
Ibid, 15
[9]
Jack Altman, This Way Sicily (Lausanne,
Switzerland: JPM Publications, 2002), 3.
[10]
Thomas S. Brown, "Byzantine Italy (680-876)," in The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire, c. 500-1492, edited
by Jonathan Shepard, 433-464. (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University
Press, 2008), 436-437.
[11]
Metcalfe, ibid, 28.
[12]
Vivien Prigent, "Palermo in the Eastern Roman Empire," in A Companion to Medieval Palermo: The History
of a Mediterranean City from 600 to 1500, edited by Annliese Nef (Boston:
Brill, 2013), 11-38.
[13]
Theodosius of Syracuse to Leo Diaconus, 880 C.E., Quoted in Francis Marion
Crawford, The Rulers of the South, 2
vols. (London: MacMillan & Co. Ltd., 1900), chapter 2, University of
Chicago Web site, accessed November 23, 2015,
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/Europe/Italy/_Texts/CRAROS/2/2*.html
[14]
Ibid.
[15]
Ibn Hawqal, Excerpt from Book of the
Traditions of Countries, 972 C.E., Translated by William Granara, "Ibn
Hawqal in Sicily," Alif: Journal of
Comparative Poetics, 3 (1983): 95.
[16]
Ibid.
[17]
Metcalfe, ibid, 50.
[18]
Taʾrīkh Jazīrat Ṣiqilliya [History of the Island of Sicily, also
known as The Cambridge Chronicle],
circa 10th or 11th century C.E., MSS in the Cambridge University Library
(Arabic text), United Kingdom, translated by Alex Metcalfe, who kindly provided
his unpublished translation of this material for use here.
[19]
Metcalfe, ibid, 56.
[20]
Ibid, xi-xvii.
[21]
Ibid, 106-108.
[22]
Barbara De Marco, "The Sounds of Change: Arabic Linguistic Influences in
Sicily," in Georgetown University
Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1988, edited by Thomas J. Walsh
(Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1989), 94-101.
[23]
Metcalfe, ibid, 36.
No comments:
Post a Comment